Synecdoche, New York
**I was so looking forward to seeing this film.
Adaptation is one of my favourite films of all time. I make everyone I get close to watch it. I identify with it.
This film however, made me feel how Pauline Kael felt after watching
Stardust Memories. She called that film ‘a horrible betrayal’. That’s how I feel. I feel betrayed.
This is a film about death, decay, hopelessness and lovelessness. It’s a film about failure. And loneliness. It’s a film about green poop, golden urine and bloody stools. It’s deliberately, wilfully pretentious and
staggeringly joyless.
In
Adaptation I loved Charlie Kaufman’s shameless self-indulgence. In this I hated it. Because there was no joy in it. If you’re going to disappear up your own arse, you have to do it with barefaced abandon. You have to do it with a sense of fun. There was so very little fun in this film.
Speaking of the play within the film – the play which is 17 years in development – one character, who happens to be playing another character (there’s a lot of that going on – it's synecdoche, arse-numbing synecdoche), says: ‘This is tedious. This is nothing.’
This, if I'm not mistaken, is Charlie Kaufman being
clever. Another character says: ‘No one wants to hear about my misery. Because they have their own. Well... fuck everybody. Amen.’
Amen.
It is a clever film – doubtless much cleverer than I am – and it’s incredibly brave. But I hated it. And I felt betrayed. I still feel betrayed.
I'm sure I have no right, but that's how I feel. Indeed, if I've understood the meaning of
synecdoche at all, this film was a stool, with blood in it.